Mesut Ozil should learn from Dennis Bergkamp!


The same folk who advocate a large squad and squad rotation are telling me that certain players cannot be dropped. Well guys it is one or the other and you cannot have it both ways. If the large squad of top class players is what is needed to win honours then so be it and if a leading player is jaded or off form he can be taken out of the firing line.

Why is it that just because of his price tag so many fans seem set against the ideas of Ozil being left out for a few games? Why is it okay to leave Santi on the bench who despite not hitting the heights of his first campaign, has contributed so much more than the German to our cause?

It should not be about the price tag, it should not be about reputation and it should not be about a players sensibilities or otherwise.

It's not about the pricetag!
It’s not about the price tag!

It should be about attitude in training, a player’s form, the team chemistry and the team balance.

One assumes he is training well?
One assumes he is training well?

Arsenal will play 60 or so games in the campaign and there will be challenges and opposition that suit different systems and different players. This being the case there will be more than enough opportunities for all.

I am not about to come down on one side of the Ozil debate or another but before you all start hurling abuse, rotten eggs or otherwise at each other and questioning Wenger’s playing of Ozil out of position can I just take you back a few years to 2003/04?

In that season you may recall we won the Premier League without losing a game. I think I missed about 6 of the 19 home games and most of you will I am sure be able to name the 11 players who drove us to glory? When you do you will no doubt write Henry and Bergkamp as our strike force right?

Well the truth is remarkably different. Dennis at the zenith of his creative powers played in only 28 of the 38 matches in the league and started 21, only just over 50%.

In the first 4 Premier League fixtures Arsenal won all 4 and Wiltord and Henry paired together shared 3 goals each of the 10 we scored. Then Wenger brought in Bergkamp and 2 league draws followed and one goal was scored and that a penalty, after the famous Pires dive at Pompey. The DB10/TH14 partnership was tried and dismissed as Bergkamp was subsequently left out for the next 3 league game as Wiltord again partnered Henry  in our attack. The Bergkampless strike duo saw us capture 3 wins and a further 7 goals.

Henry & Wiltord, NO Bergkamp
Henry & Wiltord, NO Bergkamp

So let me get this straight, Wenger was partnering Wiltord with Henry ahead of Bergkamp despite the diminutive Frenchman being in the last year of his contract and in dispute. Sadly for Sylvain he then got injured for the bulk of the campaign.

So what is the point of the history lesson? Well there was no social media in 2003 but believe it or not we all chatted at games, before games, at work and in the pub about the footie and I cannot recall any conversations were Gunners were up in arms about Dennis Bergkamp not being selected ahead of Wiltord. This is for many the greatest player in the club’s history who had given 8/9 years service, not a new player who has not even got one high level full season under his belt. We did not moan that DB was undroppable and nor did he!

I could go further back to the double campaign of 2001/2. Bergkamp only truly was consistently selected alongside Henry when Pires was injured and Wiltord moved wide. In that glorious season the legend that was Bergkamp started only 31 games across the 4 competitions and yet Wiltord started 41.

Again I have no recollection of there being campaigns to restore Dennis or play him EVERY game because he was the world’s finest Number 10. I guess it was because we were winning then but it should be no different. Bergkamp never complained once and continued to work hard on the training pitch knowing the Manager believed in him as he believed in himself.

The difference is that Bergkamp actually was the world’s greatest Number 10 and Ozil is just labelled that by our fans these days. However from what I hear from those at the club who should know Mesut has no airs and graces, just wants to play and he is not bothered about where on the pitch either. Equally I am certain like Bergkamp, now your selective memory has been restored, when not selected he will get his head down, work hard to get back in and take his chance when it comes.

In natural ability Ozil actually is the closest to Bergkamp we have had since the Dutchman retired. He has the touch, he has the vision and he makes passed others simply cannot see let alone execute BUT he must prove he has the character and the attitude of the ‘Iceman’ too.

As Billy Ocean once told the world Mesut – When the going gets tough, the tough get going! Time to show your mental toughness can match your ability and that is whether you are in the side or not in the side.

Just a few thoughts ahead of an tough away game so Arsenal, Mesut and Gunners remember Billy – COYG

Agree/disagree? Leave a comment below or follow me or comment on this blog on Twitter –

If you wish to read about Arsenal legend Geordie Armstrong please also check out the website for the new tribute book  available to pre-order now


You may also like...


  1. Dave it get your point but it all doesnt add up. Ozil is a better player than both Jack & Cazorla and i dont see the spabnisrd offering anything much better than Mesut. Seeing him vs palace in the first game was like Watching Park. He offered abosulutely nothing. Maybe Ox or Rosicky but Santi shouldnt be an option. The thing is Ozil is getting criticized because we’re not winning games and most of all not playing well. He’s become everyone’s favourite pantomime these days but is he really playing that bad? Tell me, against Dortmund did Jack or especially Ramsey offer anything better than the german? Ramsey hasnt played well all season but Ozil is wasy picking because of his price tag. There are too many players out of form to put all the blame at the feet of one player. By far our worst players this season & for some time now is Mertesacker but he gets away with it because of his supposed leadership skills. I can name atleast 5 players who’ve played consistently worse than Ozil this season lets stop making him the scape goat. If we were winning games no one will talk about it. Now to the bergkamp analogy. Thats doesnt wash with me. In 2002-03 the iceman was far from being the best no. 10 lets be honest. He’s my favourit eplayer of all time but he wasnt. He was 32 to35 during that time hence he shouldnt have been a starter. That was in the twilight of his career Ozil should be around his prime now and i dont remember so so called “best no. 10 in the world at that time ” being played out of position but only in his favoured no. 10 position. I’m not in favour of playing Ozil because of his acclaim or price tag but i want him to be played in his favoured 10 position then if he fail you drop him simple. Lets please purt Ozil’s performances into context because i dont hink he has been as bad as he’s been made out to be. I was one of few who stood by Ramsey back then and i think he hasnt done much better than the German if we’re being honest.

    1. At what point in my piece did I say he had been bad? If you think Dennis in 02 was in the twilight you were not watching. It was in 02 he should have lead Holland to the WC and nearly did.

  2. The best way to avoid criticism is WINNING for all players,managers, everybody, for some serial critics (over at Le grumble) even winning is not good enough the manager and players have to win in the manner they suggest or they still think they are entitled to moan and groan, realist recognize that we have good (FA cup winners) and bad times (25 years ago we finished outside the top 4 !!! ), This is not even remotely a bad time,supporters have to play there part and support,if you cant do that better find another club or sport. (a perfect one ha ha ).

  3. Would people demand that say Koscielny be dropped if he was not playing well at full back? You’d need to at least use the guy at his best position before concluding that he is out of form.

    1. Not really when he has not shown his true form since about February. Reputations mean nowt to me just and it is just about the team. I want to play through the centre but I want his form to justify it as well. True test of the whole pack of cards will be where they fall when Theo fit.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *