Wenger acknowledges that central midfield rotation is the key to success in 2013/14


Coming of age together
Coming of age together

Regular readers of this blog over the years might know that I have generally railed against over loading our midfield with new additions when I believed we have too many good players already competing for the 3 positions at the centre. In 2011/12 we used 10 players in the centre of the midfield in the Premier League alone, whilst City won the league with 4. My argument in the past has not in truth been not signing players better than we have. Of course we need to improve but we must not forget players themselves can improve dramatically. I don’t need to be the 30th Arsenal blogger to write an article on Aaron Ramsey this season to drive that point home!! No my problem with having 7 or 8 true first team squad members competing for 3 berths was more around whether they would be needed. This based on a belief that in the main, barring injuries Wenger simply does not rotate like other top flight coaches do.

Other managers rotate large squads weekly, and with success. Ferguson has been the master of this but I have always felt that Wenger tended to stick with a team that was performing and to not rotate. After all if I asked you all to name the starting 11 of the’ Invincibles’ season I virtually guarantee you will all have the same 11 players.  The evidence in the first 4 games of this season, even without Arteta is that Wenger is looking to rotate the central positions and if reports are true is still looking to add to his depth in this area, with Cabaye a possibility. It was a tweet in which I asked why we might need Cabaye that staring me thinking and this article is the result.  The answers as you would expect were that we need more quality, better depth and it would give Wenger the option to rotate and rest without weakening the side. I agree with all this but kept coming back to me firm feeling that Wenger does not rotate. So I decided to research and prove myself right or perhaps wrong when it comes to rotation and my conclusion is that I am wrong in my conviction and this is a firm and successful precedent for healthy rotation in the central midfield.

Cabaye leaving international team mates to join others in N5??
Cabaye leaving international team mates to join others in N5??

What I wanted to do was look at successful campaigns rather than consider recent season where we have perhaps not had the quality to rotate and/or have has horrendous injury problems. What I was looking to prove or disprove is that we rotated the key area of central midfield with success and that we did so not due to injury but by design.

The 2003/04 unbeaten title winning season seems a logical place to begin as it was our last truly successful campaign.  The first obvious point to make is that we are only talking about 2 positions in central midfield given the more traditional formation Wenger used in those. On the face of it one could argue that we used 4 top class central midfielders in that season in Vieira, Gilberto, Edu and Parlour so we must have rotated. Just in the league these four players clocked up 32, 32, 30 and 25 appearances respectively. The actual reality is however very different because the truth is that unless injured Vieira and Gilberto started. Both started 29 of thee 38 Premier League matches. Edu did start on 13 occasions but always covering for one of the 2 first choice players. Parlour stared more often on 16 occasions but most of these were on the right covering from Freddie.  So there is not much evidence even in 2003/4 despite at first glance the stats suggesting otherwise that Wenger rotated the 4 players. If Gilberto and Paddy were fit they started.

The previous campaign to assess and my personal favourite under Wenger is the double winning season of 2001/2. We scored more goals than in 2003/4, won the league with only one point less and added the FA Cup for good measure.  Interestingly this is the campaign were some detailed analysis gives us a better precedent for what I hope will see proper rotation and squad usage under Wenger in the current campaign. The previous campaign was the first without the all conquering Vieira/Petit partnership and Wenger has bought in Lauren as Manu’s replacement with limited success. In reality the berth alongside Paddy has been shared by Grimandi, Parlour and Lauren and with no one truly staking a claim.

In 2001/2 Wenger had settled on the right back position for Lauren but Edu had his permit sorted and Gio van Bronckhurst had been signed from Rangers. So Wenger had 4 potential partners for his skipper in Parlour, Grimandi, Gio and Edu. All 4 perhaps offering different attributes, all to a degree proven but would Wenger settle on one main partner for Vieira or would he rotate? Well I am pleasantly surprised to say that my memory was incorrect and he genuinely did rotate his central midfield partnerships in 2001/2. Of course Paddy as captain played all most every game but the honour of staring alongside him was fairly evenly shared. My recollection was that Parlour and Vieira and played most matches in tandem.

2 seasons along side Vieira from centre back!
2 seasons along side Vieira from centre back!

I looked at the starts for all 5 players in the main three competitions, the league, the FA Cup and the Champions League. It made interesting reading – Vieira started 51 games which was no surprise but the obvious rotation of partners was more than I had recalled.

Starts in EPL, ECL and FA Cup:

Gilles Grimandi – 15

Ray Parlour – 15

Van Bronckhurst – 14

Edu – 11

Started season alongside Paddy 2001/2
Started season alongside Paddy 2001/2

By the end of the campaign there was still a huge variation of starters with Edu and Parlour talking precedence and of course the Romford Pele famously got the Cup final gig. Only Gio was not being given game time in central midfield by the latter part of the campaign.




So having dispelled my own misconception why is this significant today and for this season?

–          We have subsequently changed our system and whilst 4/5 central midfielders was sufficient in 2002 and 2004 it is obviously not in 2013. However for 3 positions 6/7 competing is more than sufficient if all are good enough to be rotated.

–          Between 2007 and 2013 it would be fair to say whilst we have had 7 or more bodies in the squad we have not had 7 fit and genuinely good enough

–          With Ramsey, Cazorla, Rosicky, Wilshere and Arteta when fit we have 5 players all of whom I believe are good enough to rotate at the top level of this league.

–          Much as I don’t want to I will leave Abou Diaby out of my thoughts for now.

–          I feel Oxlade-Chamberlain when fit again has a long term future at CAM but again perhaps not for this season.

–          So when Arteta returns we have 5 competing for 3 berths so it is fair to say that we need a 6th top level players to add into the central midfield equation. Is Cabaye that player?

–          If he is, that suggests Wenger will continue with a double pivot and ask to 2 players to share the defensive midfield responsibility, rather than buy an out and out defensive midfielder, the likes of Morgan Schneiderlin.

–          In Arteta, Ramsey and Wilshere we certainly have 3 who can comfortably operate in the 2 deeper roles.

–          I am desperate to see Cazorla continue at CAM so with Podolski’s injury the need to strengthen on the flanks is greater than the need to strengthen in central midfield, but we do need one more truly top level player to give us a 4th option at pivot.  Cabaye is certainly good enough and I would happily see us meet the Newcastle price even thought it pains me that we did not pick him up when he left Ligue 1.

I hope the above thought process makes a degree of sense and it is all relevant based only on the premise that Wenger will rotate more this season as I have proved he has in the past.  This is certainly dependent on there being 6 or 7 players at Top 4 Premier League/International level and not 3 or 4 as we have seen in the past 6/7 years.

One final thought/suggestion and your thoughts on this would be interesting. Our short bit of historical research throws up another possible dynamic for me.  We know that Manu Petit had famously never played in midfield before he joined Arsenal and within a season he has won a domestic double and the World Cup as a DM. We know have been reminded that in 2001 and 2002 after he left quite often Wenger’s go to Holding midfielder was Gilles Grimandi, also signed having played his whole career as a centre back. So what?

From journeyman defender to World Cup winning midfielder in a year!
From journeyman defender to World Cup winning midfielder in a year!

Well we have 5 top class players in my opinion in TR7, Santi, Jack, Rambo and MA8 none of whom is an out and out defensive midfielder in the sense that many supporters want. We also have 2 international centre backs in top form (yes I was wrong on BFG) and an international and experienced right back playing centrally as if he had played there all his life. On top of this we are being linked with Toby Alderwerield who can play at Centre Back of right back, as well as Ashely Williams still. Does this potentially create and opening for our skipper Thomas Vermaelen to operate in front of the back four as a genuinely defensive midfielder? Given that fact that Wenger has done this so successfully with Petri and Grimandi and according to Vertonghen wanted to do it with him is this such an outlandish suggestion?

Good enough to be the new Manu?
Good enough to be the new Manu?

Sorry this is a tad too long but I have not written for a while and the research did surprise me and send me in a direction I was not expecting. Suffice to say I am of the belief that we need one truly top class central midfield addition to be able to rotate effectively without the performance level of the team dropping. It may be Cabaye but it just could be TV5!

Lastly for those who scream for superstar individuals please remember it is a team game and it is the chemistry of the collective in the engine room that will determine if we challenge not necessarily the stellar name. If you don’t believe this I will leave you with the 2001/2 double winning midfield once more and then give you the midfield they beat to the title, winning it in their own Manchester back yard.

Arsenal CM 2001/2 – Vieira, Parlour, Grimandi, van Bronckhurst and Edu

Man United CM 2001/2 – Keane, Scholes, Veron, Butt and Beckham

I rest my case……..

Like what you read? Agree/disagree? Leave a comment below or follow me or comment on this blog on Twitter – http://twitter.com/goonerdave66



You may also like...


  1. good article! it makes a lot of sense especially with TV5. He likes going forward,has a good shot and can put in strong tackles. we could be spoiled in midfield as it is rumoured Flamini has been a 3yr contract but will really like to see how TV5 will cope as a DM if we get a CB. cheers mate.

  2. I agree to a large extent,i think we need at least 1 box to box mid-fielder cabaye fits the bill,he has speed,good vision, & he is good set-piece taker…again,our mid-fielders are injury prone,rocisky,wilshere,diaby,arteta..i think we need options,rotation will help in this regard.Like you said viera had more playin’ time than others,arteta can do the same considerin’ he is a good passer,tackler & defend as well.

  3. I found it a good read and interesting train of thought.

    I never realised that Wenger were aiming to stick Vertongen at cdm, im sure hed have been a good one. Tv5 does look like he has all the attributes to do a grimandi, but i think the game has moved on from there. Grimandi were initially brought on to hold a lead and break some bones, he were as nastly/strong as the best of them and trained with Adams Keown etc.

    Do i think Tv5 could do a job like Grimandi, hell yes. I just dont think his (tv5) passing range/abilty is good enough for Arsenes liking to give him that role today.Furthermore, the only time i could see him play cdm is when/if we are holding a crucial lead.

    I think Cabaye would be a good bet if he commanded a fair transfer fee. For me he is a 16m player at most (due to pl exp). Maybe our board will pay the extra 4m, or go as high as 18m depending on how good Arsene does rate him.

  4. Really good article. We do have a number of very good midfield players, but in comparing to the Vieira/Petit era and Vieira/Gilberto era, what is clear to me we have only one way of playing our midfield game. I love Cazorla, Jack, Rosicky, Ramsey, Arteta, but it’s a shame we did not go for a Paulinho, Capoue type player. Then I think we could have had a plan B. A strong driving DM can give a different type of game for certain matches. Then I think rotation could have been more ‘made to measure’ with that type of player. I think at the moment we are a little one dimensional in style. During the ‘invincibles’ era we could ‘battle’ with the best of them. I remember how much Edu could get stuck in, Lauren could get stuck in. We do have a lot of players who are not made for ‘battle’ and we can get problems in those games. I do agree maybe TV could be our driving DM for certain games. This year Tottenham do worry me. In buying Capoue/Paulinho, AVB may be resurrecting a style that Wenger pioneered.

  5. interesting thoughts Dave. everytime i read your article, it brings me to a clearer view from me as a fans to know what’s inside Le Prof’s mind. Now i find a reason why wenger seems so calm for this transfer window while our neighbor quite busy wasting money for players that overrated. perhaps it’s a calm before the storm. can’t wait for september to see our full squad member

    gooners fan from indonesia

  6. The issue is different Dave. We have 3 players for CM in my opinion. Arteta, Jack & Ramsey. For me Santi and Rosicky are pure CAM. In fact they are the best in that position at the club. If either is injured , Jack or Ramsey can take up CAM. But it will be to make do. They can but their game is today more box to box. So that means for 2 CM positions we have 3 players and one CAM position 2 players. Its comfotable. But an injury leaves us short. So idea would be to have one guy who can cover. I will not like to speculate but I think it will be Flamini.

    The most precarious position is on the wings. If we had Ox fit,then RW or LW , one of them would be comfortable. Today we have no player for LW. Sure Cazorla can play there. But that should be short term. So LW needs a player. RW we have Theo, but some back up would be nice, till the time OX is back I think Gnabry can fit there. The guy is good and looks like he is unfazed with the ocassion. If we buy a RB (Sagna was born to be a CB) and Flamini. My immediate attention would ne on kickass LW and striker. Flamini is an Arsene type signing. Amazing value and allows Diaby to come back ( I do hope) while giving funds to quality signings.

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *